Sixth Circuit: Fed Firearm Ban on Citizen Who Has Been Committed to a Mental Institution Unconstitutional

breaking news

sad1Under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(4) firearm possession is prohibited by any person “who has been committed to a mental institution.” Yesterday, in Tyler v. Hillsdale Cnty Sheriff’s Dep’t, the Sixth Circuit held that the federal law is unconstitutional as applied to Plaintiff Clifford Charles Tyler.

Tyler, who is seventy-three years of age, has no criminal record, and has provided evidence that he is presently of sound mind, has nonetheless been denied the ability to purchase a firearm.

In 1985, almost thirty years ago, Tyler was involuntarily committed to a mental hospital. At the time of hospitalization, Tyler had been recently served divorce papers by his wife of twenty-seven years, who subsequently “ran away with another man and depleted Tyler’s finances.” Tyler at 5. Left emotionally devastated, broke, and alone, Tyler encountered a fit of depression. While Tyler did not act violently towards anybody else, he constantly cried, could not sleep, had suicidal thoughts and repeatedly “pound[ed] his head.” Id. The probate court found that Tyler required treatment, deeming him a potential threat to himself or others. Tyler was involuntarily committed to Ypsilanti Regional Center. During his treatment, Tyler refused medication out of fear that it would affect his brain chemistry. He was released after 2-4 weeks (the exact duration is unclear) and has been a functioning, productive member of society since his hospitalization approximately three decades ago. He remained on the workforce for almost two more decades, remarried in 1999, and continued to have a positive relationship with his children from his first marriage.

deniedIn February of 2011, Mr. Tyler was denied the purchase of a firearm. The National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS) flagged him as a person prohibited from possessing firearms under federal law, as he had in fact been committed to a mental hospital. As a result, the Hillsdale County Sheriff’s Office found him to be ineligible for firearm purchase. In efforts to overcome this finding of ineligibility, Tyler took the following actions:


  1. August 2011: Tyler appealed the denial to the FBI’s NICS section. Tyler at 6.
  2. September 8, 2011: FBI’s NICS section responded, both confirming that Tyler is ineligible to purchase a firearm under §922(g)(4), and simultaneously informing him that his appeal was “pending.” Id.
  3. September 30, 2011: Tyler, through counsel, contacted NICS authorizing the release of additional private information, and further providing supplementary information in efforts to aid NICS’ investigation. Id.
  4. January 6, 2012: FBI’s NICS section provided a formal denial of Tyler’s appeal. In its reasoning, the NICS section asserted that while federal law “provides states with the ability to pursue an ATF-approved relief of disability for individuals adjudicated as a mental defective or those who have been committed to a mental institution . . . until your state has an ATF approved relief from disabilities program in place your federal firearms rights may not be restored.” Id. At 7.

According to its reasoning, as a resident of Michigan, there was no avenue for Mr. Tyler to restore his firearms rights.

Title 18 does, however, provide a means for restoration of firearms rights. In 18 U.S.C. 925(c), federal law provides a procedure in which the attorney general may grant restoration of firearms rights to persons otherwise prohibited “if it is established to his satisfaction that the circumstances regarding the disability, and the applicant’s record and reputation, are such that the applicant will not be likely to act in a manner dangerous to public safety and that the granting of the relief would not be contrary to the public interest.”

The attorney general has since delegated these authorities to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (BATFE). In accordance with this responsibility, BATFE established regulations outlining how citizens can apply for relief of their disabilities.

ATF regulations prescribe the form and contents of an application for relief from disabilities. See 27 C.F.R. § 478.144. All applications from individuals, for instance, must contain written statements from three references and written authorization for ATF to obtain pertinent background records. § 478.144(c)(1)–(2). Applications from individuals prohibited from firearm possession because of prior commitment to a mental institution must provide: the court order mandating commitment; medical records reflecting diagnosis; and records from anyauthority showing the applicant’s discharge from commitment, restoration of medical competency, and restoration of rights. See § 478.144(c)(5). The ATF director may not grant relief to an applicant previously committed to a mental institution unless the applicant meets the requirements of 18 U.S.C. § 925(c) and unless “a court, board, commission, or other lawful authority” has subsequently determined the applicant “to have been restored to mental competency, to be no longer suffering from a mental disorder, and to have had all rights restored.” 27 C.F.R. § 478.144(e). Tyler at 3.

Here’s the problem: In 1992 Congress cut off all federal funding to the ATF relief from disability program. Since then, Congress has instituted grants available to states who form and conduct their own ATF-approved programs. Not all states have these programs.

michiganMichigan does not have an ATF-approved program which facilitates the restoration of citizens’ firearms rights. Consequently, regardless of whether or not Tyler could fulfill the listed requirements and overcome his disability, the ATF concluded that he cannot, as a Michigan resident, restore his rights to possess firearms.

Mr. Tyler has shown that, at the very least, he would be a solid candidate for relief from disability. He has no criminal record. A substance-abuse evaluation showed that Tyler does not have a substance-abuse problem. There is no evidence of any depressive episode other than the one described in 1985. As a part of the substance-abuse evaluation, a psychologist contacted Tyler’s physician, who asserted that Tyler had shown “no evidence of mental illness.” The same psychologist concluded that Tyler’s only bout with depression, which caused his involuntary commitment in 1985, “appeared to be a brief reactive episode in response to his wife divorcing him.” Because of Michigan’s failure to establish such a program, there is an effective firearm ban on all persons who have been involuntarily committed to a mental hospital.

constitutionWhy is this an issue? When the government restricts the rights of its citizens, the court identifies what purpose the restriction aims to achieve, and the means used to achieve that purpose. The right to bear arms is expressly enumerated in the United States Constitution. Accordingly, it is a fundamental right.


In order for the restriction of fundamental rights to pass constitutional muster, the government must generally meet the heavy burden of showing that the restriction is necessary to achieve a compelling purpose. This evaluation standard is known as “strict scrutiny” and means that there is no less restrictive alternative which can achieve that compelling purpose.

Other courts, including the federal district court in Tyler, have asserted that Second Amendment rights should be evaluated under “intermediate scrutiny” which only demands that the government show a restriction is narrowly tailored to achieve an important government interest. While generally speaking, fundamental rights must meet strict scrutiny, the Court has found that different situations, scenarios and variations may call for constitutional analysis under a different level of scrutiny. For instance, the First Amendment guarantees the right to free speech. Even though it is a fundamental right, the Court has held that placing reasonable time, place, and manner restrictions on speech in public fora, so long as they are viewpoint neutral, will be subject to intermediate scrutiny.


Hold on a second – the Court got “reasonable time, place, and manner restrictions on speech in public fora, so long as they are viewpoint neutral, will be subject to intermediate scrutiny” out of “Congress shall make no law abridging the freedom of speech?” Yes, it did. Neither the rules fashioned regarding when to use different tiers of scrutiny, nor the tiers of scrutiny themselves, come from the Constitution. The Supreme Court has made them up, and this sometimes makes their future decisions on uncharted waters (such as the Second Amendment) less predictable.

Although the meaning of the Second Amendment has been hotly contested for many years, the Supreme Court has recently held that it grants citizens the right to bear arms for self-defense purposes, at least in the home. [See OPEN CARRY for more]. Because fundamental rights are presumed to be subject to strict scrutiny ―although this is not a guarantee― the Sixth Circuit chose to evaluate § 922(g)(4) under strict scrutiny.

medsUnder strict scrutiny, the government would have to prove that §922(g)(4) is necessary to achieve a compelling government purpose. First, the purpose is most obviously preventing gun violence from mentally ill citizens, and protecting the citizens who might suffer at their hands. Next, we must consider the means the government has used. Through §922(g)(4), the government prohibits anybody who has been involuntarily committed to a mental hospital from possessing a firearm. Does everybody who has ever been committed to a mental hospital, regardless of the reason and point in time, pose the threat the government seeks to eliminate? I don’t believe reasonable minds can deny that this is not the case. However, due to the absence of federal funding, if the state does not provide an ATF-approved program to restore firearms rights, the citizen is not afforded such an opportunity. Consequently, the federal restriction, lacking this rehabilitative opportunity, affects far more people than permissible. In other words, there is a less restrictive alternative. That being the case, the Sixth Circuit held that §922(g)(4), as it was applied to Tyler, is in fact unconstitutional.

Although we must keep in mind that this holding has come from the Sixth Circuit, and is not currently binding nationwide, it may afford the Supreme Court the opportunity to weigh in on the situation. Considering the present circuit split regarding the level of scrutiny to be implemented for Second Amendment evaluations, this would be helpful. This decision will undoubtedly be fodder for intense debate. It will be interesting to see how the ATF responds to this decision, and if other states establish programs for its prohibited persons. Perhaps Congress will address the issue during its next session. For now, we are certain that there will be change of some kind. It remains to be seen what that change is, or how drastically it will affect the ability of those formerly prohibited under §922(g)(4) to possess firearms. multicanais xoso xoso tin chelsea thông tin chuyển nhượng câu lạc bộ bóng đá arsenal bóng đá atalanta bundesliga cầu thủ haaland UEFA everton xoso futebol ao vivo futemax multicanais onbet bóng đá world cup bóng đá inter milan tin juventus benzema la liga clb leicester city MU man city messi lionel salah napoli neymar psg ronaldo serie a tottenham valencia AS ROMA Leverkusen ac milan mbappe napoli newcastle aston villa liverpool fa cup real madrid premier league Ajax bao bong da247 EPL barcelona bournemouth aff cup asean football bên lề sân cỏ báo bóng đá mới bóng đá cúp thế giới tin bóng đá Việt UEFA báo bóng đá việt nam Huyền thoại bóng đá giải ngoại hạng anh Seagame tap chi bong da the gioi tin bong da lu trận đấu hôm nay việt nam bóng đá tin nong bong da Bóng đá nữ thể thao 7m 24h bóng đá bóng đá hôm nay the thao ngoai hang anh tin nhanh bóng đá phòng thay đồ bóng đá bóng đá phủi kèo nhà cái onbet bóng đá lu 2 thông tin phòng thay đồ the thao vua app đánh lô đề dudoanxoso xổ số giải đặc biệt hôm nay xổ số kèo đẹp hôm nay ketquaxoso kq xs kqxsmn soi cầu ba miền soi cau thong ke sxkt hôm nay thế giới xổ số xổ số 24h xoso3mien xo so ba mien xoso dac biet xosodientoan xổ số dự đoán vé số chiều xổ xoso ket qua xosokienthiet xoso kq hôm nay xoso kt xổ số mega xổ số mới nhất hôm nay xoso truc tiep xoso Việt SX3MIEN xs dự đoán xs mien bac hom nay xs miên nam xsmientrung xsmn thu 7 con số may mắn hôm nay KQXS 3 miền Bắc Trung Nam Nhanh dự đoán xổ số 3 miền dò vé số du doan xo so hom nay ket qua xo xo ket qua xo trúng thưởng xo so kq xoso trực tiếp ket qua xs kqxs 247 số miền nam s0x0 mienbac xosobamien hôm nay số đẹp hôm nay số đẹp trực tuyến nuôi số đẹp xo so hom qua xoso ketqua xstruc tiep hom nay xổ số kiến thiết trực tiếp xổ số kq hôm nay so xo kq trực tuyen kết quả xổ số miền bắc trực tiếp xo so miền nam xổ số miền nam trực tiếp trực tiếp xổ số hôm nay ket wa xs KQ XOSO xoso online xo so truc tiep hom nay xstt so mien bac trong ngày KQXS3M số so mien bac du doan xo so online du doan cau lo xổ số keno kqxs vn KQXOSO KQXS hôm nay trực tiếp kết quả xổ số ba miền cap lo dep nhat hom nay soi cầu chuẩn hôm nay so ket qua xo so Xem kết quả xổ số nhanh nhất SX3MIEN XSMB chủ nhật KQXSMN kết quả mở giải trực tuyến Giờ vàng chốt số Online Đánh Đề Con Gì dò số miền nam dò vé số hôm nay so mo so de bach thủ lô đẹp nhất hôm nay cầu đề hôm nay kết quả xổ số kiến thiết toàn quốc cau dep 88 xsmb rong bach kim ket qua xs 2023 dự đoán xổ số hàng ngày Bạch thủ đề miền Bắc Soi Cầu MB thần tài soi cau vip 247 soi cầu tốt soi cầu miễn phí soi cau mb vip xsmb hom nay xs vietlott xsmn hôm nay cầu lô đẹp thống kê lô kép xổ số miền Bắc quay thử xsmn xổ số thần tài Quay thử XSMT xổ số chiều nay xo so mien nam hom nay web đánh lô đề trực tuyến uy tín KQXS hôm nay xsmb ngày hôm nay XSMT chủ nhật xổ số Power 6/55 KQXS A trúng roy cao thủ chốt số bảng xổ số đặc biệt soi cầu 247 vip soi cầu wap 666 Soi cầu miễn phí 888 VIP Soi Cau Chuan MB độc thủ de số miền bắc thần tài cho số Kết quả xổ số thần tài Xem trực tiếp xổ số XIN SỐ THẦN TÀI THỔ ĐỊA Cầu lô số đẹp lô đẹp vip 24h soi cầu miễn phí 888 xổ số kiến thiết chiều nay XSMN thứ 7 hàng tuần Kết quả Xổ số Hồ Chí Minh nhà cái xổ số Việt Nam Xổ Số Đại Phát Xổ số mới nhất Hôm Nay so xo mb hom nay xxmb88 quay thu mb Xo so Minh Chinh XS Minh Ngọc trực tiếp hôm nay XSMN 88 XSTD xs than tai xổ số UY TIN NHẤT xs vietlott 88 SOI CẦU SIÊU CHUẨN SoiCauViet lô đẹp hôm nay vip ket qua so xo hom nay kqxsmb 30 ngày dự đoán xổ số 3 miền Soi cầu 3 càng chuẩn xác bạch thủ lô nuoi lo chuan bắt lô chuẩn theo ngày kq xo-so lô 3 càng nuôi lô đề siêu vip cầu Lô Xiên XSMB đề về bao nhiêu Soi cầu x3 xổ số kiến thiết ngày hôm nay quay thử xsmt truc tiep kết quả sxmn trực tiếp miền bắc kết quả xổ số chấm vn bảng xs đặc biệt năm 2023 soi cau xsmb xổ số hà nội hôm nay sxmt xsmt hôm nay xs truc tiep mb ketqua xo so online kqxs online xo số hôm nay XS3M Tin xs hôm nay xsmn thu2 XSMN hom nay xổ số miền bắc trực tiếp hôm nay SO XO xsmb sxmn hôm nay 188betlink 188 xo so soi cầu vip 88 lô tô việt soi lô việt XS247 xs ba miền chốt lô đẹp nhất hôm nay chốt số xsmb CHƠI LÔ TÔ soi cau mn hom nay chốt lô chuẩn du doan sxmt dự đoán xổ số online rồng bạch kim chốt 3 càng miễn phí hôm nay thống kê lô gan miền bắc dàn đề lô Cầu Kèo Đặc Biệt chốt cầu may mắn kết quả xổ số miền bắc hôm Soi cầu vàng 777 thẻ bài online du doan mn 888 soi cầu miền nam vip soi cầu mt vip dàn de hôm nay 7 cao thủ chốt số soi cau mien phi 777 7 cao thủ chốt số nức tiếng 3 càng miền bắc rồng bạch kim 777 dàn de bất bại on news ddxsmn 188bet w88 w88 789bet tf88 sin88 suvip sunwin tf88 five88 12bet sv88 vn88 Top 10 nhà cái uy tín sky88 iwin lucky88 nhacaisin88 oxbet m88 vn88 w88 789bet iwin f8bet rio66 rio66 lucky88 oxbet vn88 188bet 789bet May-88 five88 one88 sin88 bk8 8xbet oxbet MU88 188BET SV88 RIO66 ONBET88 188bet M88 M88 SV88 Jun-68 Jun-88 one88 iwin v9bet w388 OXBET w388 w388 onbet onbet onbet onbet88 onbet88 onbet88 onbet88 onbet onbet onbet onbet qh88 mu88 Nhà cái uy tín pog79 vp777 vp777 vipbet vipbet uk88 uk88 typhu88 typhu88 tk88 tk88 sm66 sm66 me88 me88 8live 8live 8live sm66 me88 win79 8live sm66 me88 win79 pog79 pog79 vp777 vp777 uk88 uk88 tk88 tk88 luck8 luck8 kingbet86 kingbet86 k188 k188 hr99 hr99 123b 8xbetvn vipbet sv66 zbet taisunwin-vn typhu88 vn138 vwin vwin vi68 ee88 1xbet rio66 zbet vn138 i9betvip fi88club cf68 onbet88 ee88 typhu88 onbet onbetkhuyenmai 12bet-moblie 12betmoblie taimienphi247 vi68clup cf68clup vipbet i9bet qh88 onb123 onbef soi cầu nổ hũ bắn cá đá gà đá gà game bài casino soi cầu xóc đĩa game bài giải mã giấc mơ bầu cua slot game casino nổ hủ dàn đề Bắn cá casino dàn đề nổ hũ tài xỉu slot game casino bắn cá đá gà game bài thể thao game bài soi cầu kqss soi cầu cờ tướng bắn cá game bài xóc đĩa AG百家乐 AG百家乐 AG真人 AG真人 爱游戏 华体会 华体会 im体育 kok体育 开云体育 开云体育 开云体育 乐鱼体育 乐鱼体育 欧宝体育 ob体育 亚博体育 亚博体育 亚博体育 亚博体育 亚博体育 亚博体育 开云体育 开云体育 棋牌 棋牌 沙巴体育 买球平台 新葡京娱乐 开云体育 mu88 qh88