The Castle Doctrine in Pennsylvania: A Rebuttable Presumption

The Castle Doctrine in Pennsylvania: A Rebuttable Presumption


There are probably few sounds more terrifying than the sound of a window breaking in your house in the middle of the night.  Someone is breaking into your home- the space that should be the safest.  How can you respond?  Legally speaking, what can you do to respond?

As terrifying as this experience would be, fortunately the law in Pennsylvania (unlike some of our neighboring States) recognizes our right to defend ourselves in the home. Under certain circumstances, even deadly force is authorized in Pennsylvania when there is an intruder in your home. This right is known in popular culture as the “Castle Doctrine.”  While the Castle Doctrine concept has some variation from state to state (and there are some states that don’t have it at all), it is often misunderstood and misinterpreted.  Anyone who has attended any of U.S. Law Shield’s “Justified Use of Deadly Force” classes has probably heard our program attorneys speak about how the Castle Doctrine provides a presumption that deadly force is reasonable in response to unauthorized or forced entry into one’s home or occupied vehicle.

A more comprehensive explanation of the castle doctrine can be found in an old article here:

Justified Part 3: The Castle Doctrine and Stand Your Ground

The recent Supreme Court of Pennsylvania opinion in COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA v. WILLIAM CHILDS has helped to confirm and clarify what our U.S. Law Shield program attorneys have been teaching, namely in the fact that this presumption under the law is a rebuttable presumption.  In other words, this presumption goes immediately in the homeowner’s favor, but that can be overridden or totally destroyed by facts. In other words, it would then take specific facts to prove that you did not have that required reasonable belief that death, serious bodily injury, kidnapping or sexual assault at the time of the shooting and/or that the threat was not imminent.

An easy way to think of this is that under the Castle Doctrine the scale of whether the action you took was in fact reasonable starts tipped very much in your direction after a self-defense incident in your home. But a rebuttable presumption is not absolute. There are circumstances or facts that can totally remove it.

For example, suppose the police arrive to your house and find a dead intruder in your house right next to the kicked in door. Initially, and with no other information, it certainly at first blush seems to have all of the hallmarks for the Castle Doctrine. You don’t give a statement. You think you are in the clear, right? However, the police notice that you have installed a security camera that covers the exact area of the shooting. They apply for and get a search warrant for the recording. The video shows the forced entry. Then, it shows you engaging the intruder with your gun. The intruder goes down, but is not dead. The intruder is not moving and appears to be totally unresponsive, but again not dead. For several minutes while you wait for the police arrive, he remains totally unresponsive, but not dead. You leave the room. You come back. You sit down with your back to intruder. Suddenly, and for no reason, you walk over to him while he still has not moved one millimeter and has presented no current immediate threat as he is totally unresponsive, you shoot him. That is an example of what would have been a very legitimate use of The Castle Doctrine totally destroyed by the circumstances.

The recent Supreme Court of Pennsylvania opinion Childs mentioned above is very instructive to us about the Castle Doctrine. In that case, some people at a small birthday party got into a verbal altercation.  After the victim was told to leave, he forced his way back into the house and began striking Child’s with a broom handle.  Childs stabbed the victim one time, which ultimately killed him.  Childs was initially convicted of murder. The trial judge ruled that Childs was not afforded the protection of the Castle Doctrine codified at 18 Pa.c.s.a. § 505(b)(2.1).  The trial court reasoned that as at the time the incident occurred the Castle Doctrine was not yet effective (although it became effective before the start of the trial).  Without the Castle Doctrine protection, Childs was convicted of murder, and sentenced to 16-32 years imprisonment.  The government did not argue that under the Castle Doctrine Childs would not have been protected, but simply said that because the Castle Doctrine was not effective at the time the incident took place its protections did not apply.  Without the castle doctrine Childs lacked the benefit of the presumption that what he did was lawful. The jury came back for the government and against him. By their verdict, the jury found that his actions were either unreasonable, and/or that he did not have imminent fear of death or serious bodily injury at the time of his actions and/or that there were other avenues he could have pursued, such as fleeing, if he could do it with complete safety which is a very fact specific determination.

Here is our state’s standard jury instruction for the Castle Doctrine.

In fact, the law further presumes that someone who unlawfully and by force enters or attempts to enter a defendant’s dwelling, residence, or occupied vehicle or removes or attempts to remove someone against their will from the defendant’s dwelling, residence, or occupied vehicle, is acting with the intent to commit an act resulting in death or serious bodily injury [or kidnapping or sexual intercourse by force or threat]. If the defendant knows or has reason to believe that this unlawful and forceful entry or act is occurring or has occurred, the law then presumes that the defendant’s belief in the necessity of using deadly force is reasonable and justified.

However, a defendant is not presumed to have a reasonable belief that deadly force is immediately necessary to protect himself or herself when:

[(i) the person against whom the force is used has the right to be in or is a lawful resident of the dwelling, residence, or vehicle, such as when they are an owner or lessee of the premises;

(ii) the person sought to be removed is a child or grandchild or is otherwise in the lawful custody or under the lawful guardianship of the person against whom the protective force is used;

(iii) the defendant is engaged in a criminal activity or is using the dwelling, residence, or occupied vehicle to further a criminal activity. “Criminal activity” means conduct that is a misdemeanor or felony, is not justifiable under the Crimes Code, and is related to the confrontation between an actor and the person against whom force is used; or

(iv) the person against whom the force is used is a peace officer acting in the performance of his or her official duties and the actor using force knew or reasonably should have known that the person was a peace officer.]

Keep this in mind: a person is justified in using deadly force against another not only when they are in actual danger of unlawful attack but also when they mistakenly, but reasonably, believe that they are. A person is entitled to estimate the necessity for the force he or she employs under the circumstances as he or she reasonably believes them to be at the time. In the heat of conflict, a person who has been attacked ordinarily has neither time nor composure to evaluate carefully the danger and make nice judgments about exactly how much force is needed to protect himself or herself. Consider the realities of the situation faced by the defendant here when you assess whether the Commonwealth has proved beyond a reasonable doubt either that [he] [she] did not believe [he] [she] was actually in danger of death or serious bodily injury to the extent that [he] [she] needed to use such force in self-defense, or that, while [he] [she] did believe that, [his] [her] belief was unreasonable.

You can see how powerful this instruction is and without it what you can lose, right?

The Superior Court in the Childs case, on appeal, reasoned that the Castle Doctrine provision was a procedural change, and that because it was in effect before the case was heard (although after the incident) it should apply, and Childs should be afforded its benefits.  It likely would not have applied if both the incident and the trial had happened before the law took effect.  The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania also agreed with the Superior Court and said that the castle doctrine should have applied, and remanded the case for a new trial.

The important takeaway is what U.S. Law Shield attorneys have already been telling people:  that the Castle Doctrine provides a presumption of the need to use deadly force without any other facts or information needed, and that such presumption is a flexible standard driven by facts which can be overcome by facts, or even your own words.

At our seminar, as a cautionary tale, we frequently share with the audience the real case handled by The McShane Firm that was called “The case of the 2 handed burglar.” The police were sent to the scene of a critical incident where a homeowner shot and killed a nighttime burglar. When the police arrived, they quickly sorted out that the homeowner was the good guy and the decedent was the intruder. The coroner was on the scene. The police were treating the homeowner well allowing him to sit at his own kitchen table to wait for the detective to show up. The homeowner was also a really nice fellow. He made coffee for the police and the detective when he arrived. The Detective initially went into the investigation thinking that this was a clear cut justified use of force case. So he just asked one question: “What happened?” The homeowner said “I was asleep upstairs. I heard some rustling downstairs. I grabbed my gun. I went downstairs. I saw that burglar getting the TV off of the wall. He had the TV in both hands. I shinned the light on him. He was surprised. I shot him while he was holding on to the TV. He dropped and broke the TV after I shot him. Then I called you guys.” Sure enough, the Detective saw the brokenTV right next to the body.



Well, that homeowner’s statement is a fine example of how your own words can really come back and haunt you. This homeowner really did a great deal of damage to his Castle Doctrine presumption, didn’t he?

Remember, even in the event of a self-defense incident and even if it is a clear cut one in your own home- LAWYER UP and SHUT UP!


[Hat tip to Gil Ambler who wrote this post with revisions by Justin McShane] multicanais xoso xoso tin chelsea thông tin chuyển nhượng câu lạc bộ bóng đá arsenal bóng đá atalanta bundesliga cầu thủ haaland UEFA everton xoso futebol ao vivo futemax multicanais onbet bóng đá world cup bóng đá inter milan tin juventus benzema la liga clb leicester city MU man city messi lionel salah napoli neymar psg ronaldo serie a tottenham valencia AS ROMA Leverkusen ac milan mbappe napoli newcastle aston villa liverpool fa cup real madrid premier league Ajax bao bong da247 EPL barcelona bournemouth aff cup asean football bên lề sân cỏ báo bóng đá mới bóng đá cúp thế giới tin bóng đá Việt UEFA báo bóng đá việt nam Huyền thoại bóng đá giải ngoại hạng anh Seagame tap chi bong da the gioi tin bong da lu trận đấu hôm nay việt nam bóng đá tin nong bong da Bóng đá nữ thể thao 7m 24h bóng đá bóng đá hôm nay the thao ngoai hang anh tin nhanh bóng đá phòng thay đồ bóng đá bóng đá phủi kèo nhà cái onbet bóng đá lu 2 thông tin phòng thay đồ the thao vua app đánh lô đề dudoanxoso xổ số giải đặc biệt hôm nay xổ số kèo đẹp hôm nay ketquaxoso kq xs kqxsmn soi cầu ba miền soi cau thong ke sxkt hôm nay thế giới xổ số xổ số 24h xoso3mien xo so ba mien xoso dac biet xosodientoan xổ số dự đoán vé số chiều xổ xoso ket qua xosokienthiet xoso kq hôm nay xoso kt xổ số mega xổ số mới nhất hôm nay xoso truc tiep xoso Việt SX3MIEN xs dự đoán xs mien bac hom nay xs miên nam xsmientrung xsmn thu 7 con số may mắn hôm nay KQXS 3 miền Bắc Trung Nam Nhanh dự đoán xổ số 3 miền dò vé số du doan xo so hom nay ket qua xo xo ket qua xo trúng thưởng xo so kq xoso trực tiếp ket qua xs kqxs 247 số miền nam s0x0 mienbac xosobamien hôm nay số đẹp hôm nay số đẹp trực tuyến nuôi số đẹp xo so hom qua xoso ketqua xstruc tiep hom nay xổ số kiến thiết trực tiếp xổ số kq hôm nay so xo kq trực tuyen kết quả xổ số miền bắc trực tiếp xo so miền nam xổ số miền nam trực tiếp trực tiếp xổ số hôm nay ket wa xs KQ XOSO xoso online xo so truc tiep hom nay xstt so mien bac trong ngày KQXS3M số so mien bac du doan xo so online du doan cau lo xổ số keno kqxs vn KQXOSO KQXS hôm nay trực tiếp kết quả xổ số ba miền cap lo dep nhat hom nay soi cầu chuẩn hôm nay so ket qua xo so Xem kết quả xổ số nhanh nhất SX3MIEN XSMB chủ nhật KQXSMN kết quả mở giải trực tuyến Giờ vàng chốt số Online Đánh Đề Con Gì dò số miền nam dò vé số hôm nay so mo so de bach thủ lô đẹp nhất hôm nay cầu đề hôm nay kết quả xổ số kiến thiết toàn quốc cau dep 88 xsmb rong bach kim ket qua xs 2023 dự đoán xổ số hàng ngày Bạch thủ đề miền Bắc Soi Cầu MB thần tài soi cau vip 247 soi cầu tốt soi cầu miễn phí soi cau mb vip xsmb hom nay xs vietlott xsmn hôm nay cầu lô đẹp thống kê lô kép xổ số miền Bắc quay thử xsmn xổ số thần tài Quay thử XSMT xổ số chiều nay xo so mien nam hom nay web đánh lô đề trực tuyến uy tín KQXS hôm nay xsmb ngày hôm nay XSMT chủ nhật xổ số Power 6/55 KQXS A trúng roy cao thủ chốt số bảng xổ số đặc biệt soi cầu 247 vip soi cầu wap 666 Soi cầu miễn phí 888 VIP Soi Cau Chuan MB độc thủ de số miền bắc thần tài cho số Kết quả xổ số thần tài Xem trực tiếp xổ số XIN SỐ THẦN TÀI THỔ ĐỊA Cầu lô số đẹp lô đẹp vip 24h soi cầu miễn phí 888 xổ số kiến thiết chiều nay XSMN thứ 7 hàng tuần Kết quả Xổ số Hồ Chí Minh nhà cái xổ số Việt Nam Xổ Số Đại Phát Xổ số mới nhất Hôm Nay so xo mb hom nay xxmb88 quay thu mb Xo so Minh Chinh XS Minh Ngọc trực tiếp hôm nay XSMN 88 XSTD xs than tai xổ số UY TIN NHẤT xs vietlott 88 SOI CẦU SIÊU CHUẨN SoiCauViet lô đẹp hôm nay vip ket qua so xo hom nay kqxsmb 30 ngày dự đoán xổ số 3 miền Soi cầu 3 càng chuẩn xác bạch thủ lô nuoi lo chuan bắt lô chuẩn theo ngày kq xo-so lô 3 càng nuôi lô đề siêu vip cầu Lô Xiên XSMB đề về bao nhiêu Soi cầu x3 xổ số kiến thiết ngày hôm nay quay thử xsmt truc tiep kết quả sxmn trực tiếp miền bắc kết quả xổ số chấm vn bảng xs đặc biệt năm 2023 soi cau xsmb xổ số hà nội hôm nay sxmt xsmt hôm nay xs truc tiep mb ketqua xo so online kqxs online xo số hôm nay XS3M Tin xs hôm nay xsmn thu2 XSMN hom nay xổ số miền bắc trực tiếp hôm nay SO XO xsmb sxmn hôm nay 188betlink 188 xo so soi cầu vip 88 lô tô việt soi lô việt XS247 xs ba miền chốt lô đẹp nhất hôm nay chốt số xsmb CHƠI LÔ TÔ soi cau mn hom nay chốt lô chuẩn du doan sxmt dự đoán xổ số online rồng bạch kim chốt 3 càng miễn phí hôm nay thống kê lô gan miền bắc dàn đề lô Cầu Kèo Đặc Biệt chốt cầu may mắn kết quả xổ số miền bắc hôm Soi cầu vàng 777 thẻ bài online du doan mn 888 soi cầu miền nam vip soi cầu mt vip dàn de hôm nay 7 cao thủ chốt số soi cau mien phi 777 7 cao thủ chốt số nức tiếng 3 càng miền bắc rồng bạch kim 777 dàn de bất bại on news ddxsmn 188bet w88 w88 789bet tf88 sin88 suvip sunwin tf88 five88 12bet sv88 vn88 Top 10 nhà cái uy tín sky88 iwin lucky88 nhacaisin88 oxbet m88 vn88 w88 789bet iwin f8bet rio66 rio66 lucky88 oxbet vn88 188bet 789bet May-88 five88 one88 sin88 bk8 8xbet oxbet MU88 188BET SV88 RIO66 ONBET88 188bet M88 M88 SV88 Jun-68 Jun-88 one88 iwin v9bet w388 OXBET w388 w388 onbet onbet onbet onbet88 onbet88 onbet88 onbet88 onbet onbet onbet onbet qh88 mu88 Nhà cái uy tín pog79 vp777 vp777 vipbet vipbet uk88 uk88 typhu88 typhu88 tk88 tk88 sm66 sm66 me88 me88 8live 8live 8live sm66 me88 win79 8live sm66 me88 win79 pog79 pog79 vp777 vp777 uk88 uk88 tk88 tk88 luck8 luck8 kingbet86 kingbet86 k188 k188 hr99 hr99 123b 8xbetvn vipbet sv66 zbet taisunwin-vn typhu88 vn138 vwin vwin vi68 ee88 1xbet rio66 zbet vn138 i9betvip fi88club cf68 onbet88 ee88 typhu88 onbet onbetkhuyenmai 12bet-moblie 12betmoblie taimienphi247 vi68clup cf68clup vipbet i9bet qh88 onb123 onbef soi cầu nổ hũ bắn cá đá gà đá gà game bài casino soi cầu xóc đĩa game bài giải mã giấc mơ bầu cua slot game casino nổ hủ dàn đề Bắn cá casino dàn đề nổ hũ tài xỉu slot game casino bắn cá đá gà game bài thể thao game bài soi cầu kqss soi cầu cờ tướng bắn cá game bài xóc đĩa AG百家乐 AG百家乐 AG真人 AG真人 爱游戏 华体会 华体会 im体育 kok体育 开云体育 开云体育 开云体育 乐鱼体育 乐鱼体育 欧宝体育 ob体育 亚博体育 亚博体育 亚博体育 亚博体育 亚博体育 亚博体育 开云体育 开云体育 棋牌 棋牌 沙巴体育 买球平台 新葡京娱乐 开云体育 mu88 qh88